Mr. Bobby Stacy, left, and Brian Massa
CASSVILLE, Mo -- Former Southwest City, Missouri cop Brian Massa used to be part of a Facebook group called "I don't need anger management...you just need to stop pissing me off!!" Massa will now have plenty of time to address his issues behind bars.
A Barry County jury convicted the killer cop of first-degree involuntary manslaughter last Thursday, nearly two years after Massa killed Mr. Bobby Stacy. The defense told the jury that Massa was forced to shoot Mr. Stacy on March 28, 2010 because Stacy "tried to run [Massa] over." Massa was pursuing Mr. Stacy in a Chevy Suburban he allegedly stole, they said. The chase ended when Stacy crashed the vehicle into a ditch east of Southwest City. Massa said Mr. Stacy tried to "run him over" after he exited his police car, thus was forced to shoot the 26-year-old Stacy.
The dash-cam and body cam on Massa's uniform told a completely different story. Missouri State Patrol, who led the investigation, also said early on that Massa's story did not match the evidence. Common sense prevailed with the jury, since the fatal shot hit Mr. Stacy in the back of the head. Evidence showed that all of the shots were fired after Mr. Stacy crashed the vehicle and was disabled and/or while Stacy was fleeing in the SUV.
"It was hard for me to breath [after the verdict was read]," Ms. Claudia Moss, Bobby's mother, told the OP-NAT EYE. Sources who attended the trial told us that several of Massa's fellow cops and friends looked "shocked" when the guilty verdict was read. One of those friends, McDonald County Chief Deputy Harvey "Bud" Gow, has a bar-code tatooed in the back of his head like the one Agent 47 from the assassin movies and video games "Hitman."
Not only does Gow's tattoo speak to the mentality of law enforcement in McDonald County, but Massa was dating his daughter at the time of the shooting.
We've also been told, by an individual who has seen the dash-cam video, that Massa and other cops from Southwest City and the McDonald County Sheriff's Office can be heard "laughing and joking" while Mr. Stacy lied there dying. The tape also catches Massa saying it took him three tries to kill Mr. Stacy, which prompted another cop (who we've been told is Gow) to say "it wouldn't have taken me that many times." Massa was asked during the trial if he tried to shoot out the tires to stop the alleged moving vehicle. He responded, "no, we are trained to shoot-and-kill."
Massa became the first police officer in the state of Missouri to ever be tried and convicted for an on-duty killing. The sentencing is scheduled for January 6. Though Massa faced up to seven years in prison, the jury recommended he serve three.
"I think he should get a lot more than that," Ms. Moss said. A wrongful death lawsuit is forthcoming.
Southwest City (MO) Police Thug Brian Massa Murders Bobby Stacy (updated 4/15/2010)
Trial Set For Southwest City (MO) Killer Cop Brian Massa (4/5/2011)
This objection will ultimately be deemed “vituperative,” “conspiracy,” “paranoid” and/or some other adjectives to minimize the truth herein, and likely will not even be read by Respondent (“Arizona”) nor the Court. Regardless, Petitioner (“Wilkins”) objects to the Report and Recommendation issued by the Court, and will keep this short. The final order from this Court needs to at least include the reality that facts means very little in prosecutions of average citizens (“subjects”). It is well established that U.S. courts are bound by the culture and tradition of viewing all evidence “in the light most favorable to the prosecution,” Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (1979), regardless of indisputable facts and malice committed by them.
The facts remain that:
1. The State of Arizona prosecuted the Petitioner on charges which they claim affected “multiple victims.” Once the Petitioner completed the 140+ hours of slave labor U.S. municipalities refer as “community service,” Arizona then admitted there were in fact no victims in this case (see page 4, near bottom ("victim status")). In short, this entire case was prosecuted on false pretenses, thus a fundamental miscarriage of justice which the Court refuses to acknowledge.
2. The Maricopa County Superior Court, sua sponte, unlawfully vacated Petitioner’s trial without a written motion, which violates the Sixth Amendment’s speedy trial provisions.
3. State of Arizona failed to produce grand jury transcripts, court transcripts, and files from public defenders – upon motion by Petitioner requesting said discovery - once it finally “granted” the Petitioner his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself in post-conviction proceedings. Petitioner was denied self-representation in the prosecution stage.
4. The alleged “plea agreement” signed by the Petitioner was expired and altered after he unwittingly signed it.
I’ve re-hashed these facts and many others to every level of Arizona state courts, all of which were completely ignored and denied without review or explanation. Now this Court did everything in its power to rationalize all the egregious constitutional violations to make sure “the State” can continue their persecutions unabated. This Court has established that it does not even matter that the prosecutor responsible for the instant case, Andrew Thomas, will likely be disbarred by the Arizona Supreme Court for several malicious prosecutions over the past five years. The State Bar, however, is only taking these realities to heart because the malicious prosecutions involve their own people (county supervisors, county judges, etc.). In other words, it is unconstitutional and unlawful for Andrew Thomas to maliciously prosecute state agents, but perfectly legal and encouraged for him to do so to average subjects to “the state.” The instant case, if nothing else, is now documented precedent of preferential treatment for government/ruling class citizens over all remaining U.S. subjects.
A few months ago, the United States Supreme Court reversed a $14 million judgment against Louisiana prosecutor Harry Connick, Sr., even though it was clearly established that Connick’s office wantonly and deliberately withheld exculpatory evidence which left an innocent man sitting on death row for 14 years. Connick v. Thompson , 563 U. S. ____ (2011). The goal of U.S. courts is the protection of its prosecutors and the upholding of malicious convictions of unwitting American subjects, regardless of facts and malice by said prosecutors. Americans cannot be called “citizens,” as all rights allegedly enumerated in the U.S. Constitution simply do not apply in real life situation, except of course, absolute immunity for prosecutorial malice and manipulation. See Eleventh Amendment. As Petitioner sits writing this document, a man named Troy Davis will be executed by the State of Georgia in a matter of hours, even though there is no physical evidence tying him to the “murder” the State of Georgia convicted him of. Again, it is not about facts, it is about furthering the U.S. police state and keeping the subjects in line. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari of Mr. Davis’ appeal because of some “procedural bar” U.S. courts may invoked whenever and however they choose. Davis v. State, 263 Ga 5, 426 S.E.2d 844, cert. denied, 510 U.S. 950, 114 S. Ct. 396 (1993); Davis v. Terry, 465 F.3d 1249, 1256 (11th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 3010 (2007). Again, American “subjects” must follow every procedure verbatim and on time, or forever lose that potential slim opportunity at truth setting them free. But again, government agents can violates any and all statutory and procedural guidelines and win their convictions and have them upheld by other (“higher”) courts.
The Thirteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution did not end slavery; it simply moved it to U.S. courts and prisons. Per said amendment, slavery is illegal unless the slave has been “duly convicted” in a U.S. court. This was the great compromise between Confederate states (and territories, i.e. Arizona) and the Union, which guaranteed slavery would still exist, as long as a “conviction” happened in a U.S. court. This arrangement between U.S. courts, prosecutors, and corporations has made private prison giants Corrections Corporation of America and GEO Group two of the most prosperous business in America, despite economic downturn almost everywhere else. This arrangement also got 140+ hours of slave labor by the Petitioner for Maricopa County.
The Court and Arizona now believe they have won because the Petitioner will endure a life sentence of “felony record,” which is the new Dred Scott, Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857), if you will…rendering millions of Americans third class human chattel. Again, the Thirteenth (and Fourteenth) Amendments overturned Dred Scott and established the “felony class” in lieu of the “slave class.” I do give credit, in that the European imperial empire has kept their chattel stock and convinced a vast majority of Americans this does not exist anymore. It is very clever, especially as Petitioner has read hundreds of denied habeas corpus petitions which judges use any and every possible reason to uphold the “slavery.” However, many of us, including myself, are now not accepting this imperial government as legitimate…only as an occupier which manipulates its human subjects. I am now free, as the answers and truth I’ve sought are now concrete and indisputable. I thank the Court for establishing once and for all that Americans not part of the Ruling elite, are subjects to the state, tenants in their own home, and do not even own our own bodies. "The ownership of all property is in the state; individual so-called 'ownership' is only by virtue of the government...and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state." Sen. Doc. No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session. All American subjects are listed as "a tenant" in the home they supposedly “own.” An illegitimate government, operating under false premises of freedom and liberty, means Petitioner is a free soul now, despite what “the state” does to impede on that. The truth has set me free.
Petitioner, again, would just like to thank Arizona courts and U.S. District Courts for their clarification on the issues herein. It is established that facts do no matter in these courts, so despite the Petitioner’s objection to the Thirteenth Amendment slavery agreement the U.S. government made, it will continue unabated. I look forward to reading more of your decisions in the future and educating the masses about the underlying goals of U.S. “justice.”
Submitted this 21th Day of September, 2011.
"What is missing from the seismograph for the Washington DC area 5.8 magnitude earthquake are the primary or “P” waves. All earthquakes that are the direct result of fault rupture have these primary or “P” waves. Nuclear detonations do not."Granted it is not unheard of for an earthquake to hit the East Coast and Midwest...